In this session, we continued exploring the lively debate surrounding plant sentience by diving into a diverse set of responses to the paper “Plant Sentience? Between Romanticism and Denial.” The discussion began with a traditional scientific rebuttal emphasizing the absence of neurotransmitters and signaling pathways in plants, often cited as evidence against their sentience.
However, the following papers brought a broader and more intriguing perspective to the table. Philosophical and psychological angles questioned the biases shaping this debate, while others proposed promising avenues for reframing our understanding of plant intelligence.
This session invited us to challenge conventional views and consider how expanding our framework for sentience could enrich our relationship with the natural world. The diversity of arguments showcased the ongoing evolution of this fascinating conversation, revealing how much remains to be explored about plant cognition and its implications for science, ethics, and personal growth.
Commentary on plant sentience within Naturally Conscious Community:
LIVE Plant Consciousness Commentary every Friday
Where we explore all things plant neurobiology, plant cognition, plant intelligence, plant humanities, and the birth of critical plant studies through the lens of personal evolution. Livestreams are every Friday on Youtube and the Naturally Conscious Community.
Be a part of the conversation in the Naturally Conscious Community
Let’s talk more in the only online ecosystem that nourishes plant reawakening for enhanced evolution and collaboration with our plant friends. Connect with nature-conscious creatives, multipotentialites, and naturentrepreneurs who share your desire to see beauty in the world. >> JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <<
Looking for a mentor/coach to help you confidently embody a Naturally Conscious Life? Book a discovery call here, and let’s discuss how I can support you.
Mallatt, Jon; Robinson, David G; Blatt, Michael R; Draguhn, Andreas; and Taiz, Lincoln (2023) Plant sentience: The burden of proof. Animal Sentience 33(15)
If you have a paper, essay, article, or video you would like me to comment on, send it to me!
We use information collected through cookies and similar technologies to improve your experience on our site, analyse how you use it and for marketing purposes.
We and our partners use information collected through cookies and similar technologies to improve your experience on our site, analyse how you use it and for marketing purposes. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. In some cases, data obtained from cookies is shared with third parties for analytics or marketing reasons. You can exercise your right to opt-out of that sharing at any time by disabling cookies.
These cookies and scripts are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, suchas setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block oralert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
Analytics
These cookies and scripts allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies and scripts, we will not know when you have visited our site.
Embedded Videos
These cookies and scripts may be set through our site by external video hosting services likeYouTube or Vimeo. They may be used to deliver video content on our website. It’s possible for the video provider to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on this or other websites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies or scripts it is possible that embedded video will not function as expected.
Google Fonts
Google Fonts is a font embedding service library. Google Fonts are stored on Google's CDN. The Google Fonts API is designed to limit the collection, storage, and use of end-user data to only what is needed to serve fonts efficiently. Use of Google Fonts API is unauthenticated. No cookies are sent by website visitors to the Google Fonts API. Requests to the Google Fonts API are made to resource-specific domains, such as fonts.googleapis.com or fonts.gstatic.com. This means your font requests are separate from and don't contain any credentials you send to google.com while using other Google services that are authenticated, such as Gmail.
Marketing
These cookies and scripts may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies and scripts, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Facebook Advanced Matching
Facebook Advanced Matching can improve ads attribution and conversion tracking. It can help us reach better-targeted custom audiences through our ads. When possible, we will share with Facebook hashed information like your name, phone, email, or address.
Facebook CAPI
Facebook Conversion API Events (CAPI) help us better understand how you interact with our websites. They allow us to measure the impact of our ads on the website's conversions and they improve ads targeting through custom audiences. When possible, we might share with Facebook information like name, email, phone, address.
Tigrilla Gardenia
More Denials of Plant Sentience, Yet There Is Hope
In this session, we continued exploring the lively debate surrounding plant sentience by diving into a diverse set of responses to the paper “Plant Sentience? Between Romanticism and Denial.” The discussion began with a traditional scientific rebuttal emphasizing the absence of neurotransmitters and signaling pathways in plants, often cited as evidence against their sentience.
However, the following papers brought a broader and more intriguing perspective to the table. Philosophical and psychological angles questioned the biases shaping this debate, while others proposed promising avenues for reframing our understanding of plant intelligence.
This session invited us to challenge conventional views and consider how expanding our framework for sentience could enrich our relationship with the natural world. The diversity of arguments showcased the ongoing evolution of this fascinating conversation, revealing how much remains to be explored about plant cognition and its implications for science, ethics, and personal growth.
Commentary on plant sentience within Naturally Conscious Community:
LIVE Plant Consciousness Commentary every Friday
Where we explore all things plant neurobiology, plant cognition, plant intelligence, plant humanities, and the birth of critical plant studies through the lens of personal evolution. Livestreams are every Friday on Youtube and the Naturally Conscious Community.
Be a part of the conversation in the Naturally Conscious Community
Let’s talk more in the only online ecosystem that nourishes plant reawakening for enhanced evolution and collaboration with our plant friends. Connect with nature-conscious creatives, multipotentialites, and naturentrepreneurs who share your desire to see beauty in the world. >> JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <<
Get to Know Me, Tigrilla Gardenia
WORKING TOGETHER:
COURSES and PROGRAMS:
Memberships:
Looking for a mentor/coach to help you confidently embody a Naturally Conscious Life? Book a discovery call here, and let’s discuss how I can support you.
Episodes related plant attention
More Replies to Provocations on Plant Sentience
Replies to Segundo-Ortin & Calvo’s Provocations on Plant Sentience
References
Segundo-Ortin, M., & Calvo, P. (2023). Plant sentience? Between romanticism and denial: Science. Animal Sentience, 8(33), 1.
ten Cate, Carel (2023) Plant sentience: A hypothesis based on shaky premises. Animal Sentience 33(13)
Mastinu, Andrea (2023) Plant sentience: “feeling” or biological automatism?. Animal Sentience 33(14)
Mallatt, Jon; Robinson, David G; Blatt, Michael R; Draguhn, Andreas; and Taiz, Lincoln (2023) Plant sentience: The burden of proof. Animal Sentience 33(15)
If you have a paper, essay, article, or video you would like me to comment on, send it to me!
Share this post